Allen’s 1975 lecture (that we’ve been serializing) continues. More on Ezra Pound
AG: Ok. We need a whole course on Pound (alone), but, briefly, they (the early American modernists) were faced with the problem, 1905-1910, (that Walt) Whitman had already broken apart the old forms. Pound had a little poem..[“A Pact”] – he didn’t like Whitman, because, at first, he thought that Whitman was too unsophisticated and too cranky and too American-provincial, compared to his friend Henry James (who was almost a contemporary of Whitman’s). In other words, that’s “so refined a mind that no idea could violate it” – Who said that? – Henry James (allegedly) had “so refined a mind that no idea could violate it” – That’s Pound or Eliot talking about James, [it was Eliot] and it was that kind of really sharp mind that you had to deal with then. So there was a certain European culture that (Pound) dug, and he also got kicked out of Wabash College, Illinois, because he took in a girl who was supposed to have been (a) loose girl-of-the-streets, and put her up in his room overnight, and didn’t even sleep with her, and created a great scandal, and this was American culture, provincial culture. So he finally went to Venice where everybody understood things more.
Now he realized that American prosody (we know what the word means, now, by this time – prosody is the measure of the verse and the way that you look at your verse line, the way you figure out how to arrange it on the page, the rhythm, the hearing of it, the sounds, the vowels, counting syllables, or counting iambics, or counting stress, or counting length of vowel) – he realized that American prosody still had to be formed, that it was a whole new field that had to be started all over again from the bottom. Then he also realized that the cause of the problem was a transition from English traditional meters, traditional book meters in English, to American rhythms, which are different from the English rhythms. People in England talk different from people in America (in England, they talk differently, in America, they talk different!). So the rhythms are different too.
So Pound, being a great scholar, went to find all the parallels in history where there was a transition from an official, or archaic, or classical, prosody and tongue and language to a popular language. There are other times in history when this has happened, and those have been times of great growth and creation of new forms. So he went, as I mentioned before
, to Sextus Propertius
, who had made the transition from the Greek dance rhythms, (bringing) Greek dance rhythms into Latin verse. (He) made use of the treasury of Greek dance rhythms to get Latin verse hopped up a little and get it out of the heavy-handed mold that it was in, a heavy-mouthed mold. He went to Chinese, because he realized that the English language and the American language were subject to such abstractions – the language itself was”more subject to abstraction and conditioned thought than hieroglyphic language(s), in which each word is a picture. So that in his essay on “The Chinese Written Character as a Medium for Poetry
“, (Pound) notes on notes of a professor, Ernest Fenollosa,
who had done that kind of study.
(Fenollosa) pointed out that we have the word “red” – R-E-D – Now, we’re conditioned to see
red when we hear
red. In Chinese, the word “red” is a combination (of the) hieroglyph of rust, a flamingo’s neck, a sun setting behind a tree, and maybe something else. In other words, pictures that carry the actual red instead of the abstract word, “R-E-D”. And so it was out of that study that he got to the ideas of Imagism
, that is, that it should be primarily (a) visual image.
And he pointed out that poetry had always been a combination of three basic elements – phanopoeia – the casting of a visual image on the mind’s eye – melopoeia – the tone-leading of vowels, or the melody of vowels with tones and with lengths of vowels, or the vocalization part, melody, including rhythm somewhat – and logopoeia or the wittiness of the words, the funniness of the words, or, as he said, “the dance of the intellect among words”. So there’s the intellectual logopoeia, there’s the melopoeia, which is a song, and there is the phanopoeia, which is the picture part.
Now for the melopoeia
part (which is what you were asking about really), for the melopoeia
, he went to research how rhythms had been adapted and changed when all the high-class verse had been written in Greek and then there were all these creepy Latins trying to write in their vulgar Latin tongue (because Athens was the great cultural center, and for a long while it was considered vulgar to write in Latin). However, Sextus Propertius (so go read Ezra Pound’s “Homage to Sextus Propertius”)
was the great man who brought Greek rhythms into Latin in a way that they were useable in Latin and fitted the Latin tongue, or was conscious of the problem. (Propertius) was conscious of the transition. There was a tradition in Dante
from writing in church Latin to writing in the Vulgate tongue, and I think Dante also – who else beside Dante? – was the first – Petrarch?
Student: Petrarch’s the first.
AG: Petrarch was the first to write sonnets in Latin, and I guess invent a sonnet form perhaps,
Then he (Pound) got interested in the Provencal
tongue – Provencal – provincial – (just) like Williams – Do you know what century? 13th? 14th? 12th? 12th-13th? – (In the) 12t-13th centuries, Frenchmen in the south of France stopped writing in a royal tongue and started writing in a local dialect (like Kerouac wrote? (spoke) in Canuck,
local dialect, from Lowell, Massachusetts…